Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin Guiney's avatar

Before AI arrived on the scene, when I was delivering a technical program and was preparing to test student’s skills in the lab, I’d sit down with a ruler and pencil and draw a grid, write the students names on the side and the skills to be tested across the top. Took about 5 minutes. I used that sheet to track the logistics and next up for a lab problem.

Of course we tracked the scores in a spreadsheet on the laptop sitting at the desk where we monitored the students. My colleague, hated seeing me make that grid in my notebook, he came excited one day, he made it on a spreadsheet and printed it out. Did he think that I couldn’t produce a simple grid with a spreadsheet? He did this twice.

The second time, I told him, I do this for two reasons. Its organic, these employees have to pass this program or they lose their job, When I draw this grid, it grounds me, I’m present, and secondly it’s practical, I grab the notebook walk to the class, to call the next students into the lab. I said whats next, you want to buy an intercom, so we don’t have to walk to the classroom and escort the student to the lab, just call their name on a speaker?

So your article hits home with me. If we take away “drawing that little grid”, that something organic, human, and important to workers, at all levels, whats left? AI has the power to transform, but think it through carefully.

Great job on this article Joel, you might enjoy my latest post, about High-Stakes presence erosion…https://kevinguiney.substack.com/p/high-stakes-presence-erosion

Expand full comment
Colette Molteni's avatar

You put language to something I’ve felt in my own work with AI, that quiet shift from tool to crutch, from co-creator to ghostwriter. Your phrase “information inversion” hit me like a mirror.

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts